Source
- URL: https://x.com/nicbarkeragain/status/1872004349968392462
- Author: Nic Barker (@nicbarkeragain)
- Posted: 2024-12-25 19:39:51
Branch
1/ @nicbarkeragain
@Jonathan_Blow @rflaherty71
It’s interesting that I’ve seen this exact issue (re:llvm) come up in several domains - there is a monolithic solution that is really 10 pieces combined. You only need 1 of the pieces, but there are no high quality alternatives to that small part. Huge opportunity there I think.
2/ @ForrestTheWoods
@nicbarkeragain @Jonathan_Blow @rflaherty71
The amount of useful work LLVM has enabled is staggering. But it seems everyone eventually hates their stuck on LLVM. I don’t know enough to contribute. But agreed it feels like an opportunity.
3/ @nicbarkeragain
@ForrestTheWoods @Jonathan_Blow @rflaherty71
Absolutely, credit where it’s due they had a huge hand in kick starting the recent wave of new systems programming languages. Feels similar to typescript - awesome idea and functionality, but you become trapped with the poor performance implementation