Source

Thread

1/ @rfleury

I have no idea how the idea that data structures are coupled to *layout of data structures in memory * got so pervasive with programmers. It’s like nobody ever learned anything other than malloc’ing each node and stuffing a single tiny payload into them. Totally bizarre.

2/ @plop

@rfleury

well I have an idea, just use c++ 🤷‍♂️ it’s not like the average person can easily avoid using std containers

3/ @rfleury

@plop

Custom data structures and memory management are not nearly as hard as people make them out to be. In fact, they end up being easier in a lot of ways. I don’t think it’s that difficult to teach, but maybe some good visualizers/debuggers would help make it trivial to understand.

4/ @plop

@rfleury

well I agree we should teach them more, but they do add a lot of potential for bugs, which is why a lot companies/programmers choose to rely on silly but robust std maps instead of writing their own hash maps

5/ @rfleury

@plop

I realize people claim that but it’s never actually measured. In practice it seems entirely false, especially with simple sanity checks and testing. It’s ridiculous, to me, that writing a hash-table is seen as unbearably difficult for professional programmers industry at large.

6/ @rfleury

@plop

Furthermore, this touches on another myth, which is that programmers “choose data structures”. Data structures are not mutually exclusive. When you restrict yourself to choosing one out of a standard library, you eliminate a massive space of possibilities.

7/ @rfleury

@plop

Programmers should instead learn data structure principles and how to mix-and-match them at will.

0 items under this folder.